It is worth stating plainly what the HSRA did not believe. It did not believe that shooting police officers would drive the British from India. Nobody in that organisation thought a few dozen young men with revolvers could defeat the Indian Army.
Its stated reasoning was different, and it was borrowed from European revolutionary practice: propaganda by deed. An action would be carried out that could not be ignored. The state would respond with a trial. The trial would be public. And the accused would use it — from the dock, in statements reported in every newspaper in India — to argue a political case to an audience the movement could not otherwise reach.
On its own terms, this worked. The Lahore Conspiracy Case turned a group of unknown young men into national figures and put the word socialist into mainstream Indian political conversation. It also killed them.
Where Sukhdev sat in this
The method needed two kinds of people: those who carried out actions, and those who built and maintained the organisation capable of producing them. Sukhdev belonged to the second category, which is precisely why he is the least visible of the three men hanged in 1931 — and why his role was central.
Recruiting is slow. Vetting is slow. Political education is slow. Safe houses, couriers, the movement of people and materials across a policed province — none of it makes an anecdote. All of it is the difference between a conspiracy and a functioning organisation.